DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No. 07574-12
5 November 2012
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 5 November 2012. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
The Board notes that you have applied for a correction to your
record for an error that allegedly occurred more than 40 years
ago. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a
correction of a naval record must be made within three years
after the discovery of the alleged error. Failure to file
within the prescribed three years may be excused only in cases
where the Board finds that it is in the interests of justice to
do so.
Marine Corps enlisted advancements are based on a competitive
system which considers a variety of performance factors
including a candidate’s overall performance, technical
knowledge, military proficiency, performance of duty, conduct,
education, physical fitness, time in service, time in grade,
experience, awards, decorations, and the like. Before any
candidate may be advanced, the candidate must have the favorable
recommendation of their commanding officer. Personnel within
each rating (job) compete with each other for a limited number
of promotion vacancies. Only those qualified candidates for
whom vacancies exist are advanced. In such cases, service
record entries are made (often accompanied by a short ceremony
Docket No. 07574-12
and delivery of a certificate memorializing the advancement )
which actually effects the advancement. The absence of a
service record showing the effective date of an advancement
indicates that a candidate was not actually advanced. However,
even though your record shows that you were, in fact, advanced
to LCPL, you also received numerous nonjudicial punishments and
were found guilty at summary court-martial in which you were
reduced in rank to PFC, prior to your discharge.
Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the
entire record, the Board determined that there is insufficient
evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant any relief.
The Board found that it is not in the interests of justice to
excuse the three-year time limit in your particular case. You
neglected to assert your claim for an inordinately long period
of time without justification and due to your frequent acts of
misconduct. You have provided no evidence as to why you did not
seek to have the alleged error corrected earlier.
Additionally, review of your naval record reveals that you
signed a Certificate of Discharge or Release (DD Form 214) which
indicates that you were discharged honorably in the rank of PFC.
There is no evidence that you were or should have been advanced
beyond that rank prior to your discharge. As explained above, a
passing score on an advancement exam and/or completion of
required training courses alone do not automatically entitle a
candidate to advancement.
Based on the circumstances described above, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
3 swt Tin for tn
77 ‘ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08760 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2012. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06947 12
Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. The absence of a service record showing the effective date of an advancement indicates that a candidate was not actually advanced. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05884 12
Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Before any candidate may be advanced, the candidate must have the favorable recommendation of their commanding officer. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09521 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2012. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08253 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2012. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10183 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2012. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09850 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2012. It is possible, even common, for a candidate to receive a passing score on an advancement exam and/or to complete minimum required advancement courses, but still not be Docket No.09850-12 actually advanced. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08966 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2012. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01051 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2012. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07378 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2012. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.